User Tools
processing:complex-multi-phase
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
processing:complex-multi-phase [2023/12/10 07:59] smerkel |
processing:complex-multi-phase [2023/12/10 11:11] (current) smerkel |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
| ====== In the works: indexing a complex dataset with many phases ====== | ====== In the works: indexing a complex dataset with many phases ====== | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
| ===== Identify phases and peaks ===== | ===== Identify phases and peaks ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{ :processing:indexing:gay2023_bridgmanite_2dplot.png?direct&200|}} | ||
| One of the most critical tasks of this work is to know what you are looking for. In our case, we typically have | One of the most critical tasks of this work is to know what you are looking for. In our case, we typically have | ||
| Line 14: | Line 18: | ||
| * a pressure medium, often a simple cubic phase, with one peak. | * a pressure medium, often a simple cubic phase, with one peak. | ||
| - | To do so, it is much better to work on an [[processing:phase_identification|histogram of the extracted g-vectors]]. | + | To do so, it is much better to work on an [[processing:phase_identification| 2θ-histogram of the experimental g-vectors]]. |
| + | |||
| + | The figure on the right shows an example from Gay //et al//, published in //Earth and Planetary Science Letters// in 2023 [doi: [[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118015| 10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118015]]]. The sample holds 4 sample phases and a pressure medium (KCl). Top image is an ω-stack for all experimental g-vectors, potted as a function of ds and η. The bottom image is what you get if you try to index an average diffraction image directly. The middle panel is what is extracted from a 2θ-histogram of the experimental g-vectors. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The histogram is less affected by very large grains (the pressure medium in our case). In addition, experimental peak broadening, due to the instrument or the sample properties such as grain size or microstrains, have been removed since we only consider the center of mass of eack peak. | ||
| + | |||
| + | You can then use your favorite powder diffraction software, such as [[https://github.com/seto77/PDIndexer|PDIndexer]] or [[https://luttero.github.io/maud/ | MAUD]] to identify sample phases and their unit cell parameters. Just keep in mind that peak intensities in the histograms are not true intensities, but a number of experimental g-vectors. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Custom GVE files for each phase ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | We will need a custom GVE file for each phase we want to index. In those files (see [[fileformat:gveexample|detailed file format here]]): | ||
| + | * the first line needs to be altered with the unit cell parameters and lattice centering (one of P,A,B,C,I,F), | ||
| + | * the section on computed theoretical g-vectors for the unit cell needs to be updated, | ||
| + | * The actual scattering vectors (g-vectors) extracted from the experimental data below is identical for all phases, since we do not know how they are assigned. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Use a tool like [[processing:list-peaks-from-cif|timelessPeaksFromCIF]], for each of the phases you wish to consider, and create a custom GVE file with the proper unit cell parameters, lattice centering, and computed theoretical g-vectors. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In our case, we do not index peaks from the pressure medium, but simply ignore the corresponding 2θ in the indexing. This can be easily done by specifying custom 2θ ranges in the GrainSpotter input file. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Indexing loop ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Let's say your sample consist of 3 phases, phaseA, phaseB, phaseC, with the 3 corresponding experimental GVE files, phaseA.gve, phaseB.gve, phaseC.gve. The indexing process will go as follows | ||
| + | * index grains for phaseA, with a strict set of tolerances, | ||
| + | * remove the assigned experimental g-vectors from all 3 phaseA.gve, phaseB.gve, and phaseC.gve, | ||
| + | * index grains for phaseB, with a strict set of tolerances, | ||
| + | * remove the assigned experimental g-vectors from all 3 phaseA.gve, phaseB.gve, and phaseC.gve, | ||
| + | * index grains for phaseC, with a strict set of tolerances, | ||
| + | * remove the assigned experimental g-vectors from all 3 phaseA.gve, phaseB.gve, and phaseC.gve, | ||
| + | * and repeat the process as many times as necessary, with the same tolerances, and then increasing tolerances to catch most sample grains, merging all the indexed grains into one master file. | ||
| + | |||
| + | You can either run this by hand, your use a fancy loop with a bash script. We actually spent some time working on such a loop, and you can find an [[examples:gs_loop_multiphase|example of a multiphase indexing loop here]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Preparing figures ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This will be written later. We are still waiting for some publications to be accepted. | ||
processing/complex-multi-phase.1702195149.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/12/10 07:59 by smerkel
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: GNU Free Documentation License 1.3
